Univ.-Prof. Dr. med. Walter Heindel

• Direktor Institut für Klinische Radiologie Münster
• Leiter Referenzzentrums Mammographie Universitätsklinkum Münster

• 0251 83 47301
• 0251 83 49656
• heindel@uni-muenster.de

Über mich

Univ.-Prof. Dr. med. Walter Heindel, Jahrgang 1958, ist Direktor des Instituts für Klinische Radiologie und Leiter des Referenzzentrums Mammographie Universitätsklinikum Münster an der Westfälischen Wilhelms-Universität Münster.

AKTUELLE VERÖFFENTLICHUNGEN

Weigel S, Decker T, Korsching E, Hungermann D, Böcker W, Heindel W. Calcifications in Digital Mammography Screening: Improvement of Early Detection of Invasive Breast Cancers.
Radiology 2010; 255(3):738-74

Biesheuvel C, Weigel S, Heindel W. Mammography Screening: Evidence, History and Current Practice in Germany and Other European Countries.
Breast Care (Basel). 2011; 6(2):104-109.

Heidinger O, Batzler WU, Krieg V, Weigel S, Biesheuvel C, Heindel W, Hense HW. The incidence of interval cancers in the German mammography screening program: results from the population-based cancer registry in North Rhine-Westphalia.
Dtsch Arztebl Int. 2012 Nov; 109(46):781-7. doi: 10.3238/arztebl.2012.0781

Weigel S, Biesheuvel C, Berkemeyer S, Kugel H, Heindel W. Digital mammography screening: how many breast cancers are additionally detected by bilateral ultrasound examination during assessment?
Eur Radiol. 2013 Mar; 23(3):684-91. doi: 10.1007/s00330-012-2664-2.

Weigel S, Berkemeyer S, Girnus R, Sommer A, Lenzen H, Heindel W.
Digital mammography screening with photon-counting technique: can a high diagnostic performance be realized at low mean glandular dose?
Radiology. 2014 May; 271(2):345-55. doi: 10.1148/radiol.13131181.

Weigel S, Heindel W, Heidinger O, Berkemeyer S, Hense HW. Digital mammography screening: Association between detection rate and nuclear grade of ductal carcinoma in situ.
Radiology. 2014; 271(1):38-44.

Timpe L, Berkemeyer S, Puesken M, Tio J, Heindel W, Weigel S. Rates of presurgical underestimation of breast cancer after standardized assessment of breast calcifications.
Rofo. 2015 Jun; 187(6):445-9. doi: 10.1055/s-0034-1399273.

Heidinger O, Heidrich J, Batzler WU, Krieg V, Weigel S, Heindel W, Hense HW. Digital mammography screening in Germany: Impact of age and histological subtype on program sensitivity.
Breast. 2015 Jun; 24(3):191-6. doi: 10.1016/j.breast.2014.12.009.

Weigel S, Heindel W, Heidrich J, Heidinger O, Hense HW. Reduction of Advanced Breast Cancer Stages at Subsequent Participation in Mammography Screening.
Rofo. 2016 Jan; 188(1):33-7. doi: 10.1055/s-0041-107835.

Weigel S, Hense HW, Heidrich J, Berkemeyer S, Heindel W, Heidinger O. Digital Mammography Screening: Does Age Influence the Detection Rates of Low-, Intermediate-, and High-Grade Ductal Carcinoma in Situ?
Radiology. 2016 Mar; 278(3):707-13. doi: 10.1148/radiol.2015150322.

Weigel S, Heindel W, Heidrich J, Hense HW, Heidinger O. Digital mammography screening: sensitivity of the programme dependent on breast density.
Eur Radiol. 2016 Nov 7. [Epub ahead of print]

Seit 1983 mehr als 500 peer-reviewed Publikationen
z. B. in Radiology, AJR, Eur Radiol, RoFo, J Nucl Med, Human Brain Mapp, J Cardiovasc Magn Reson, Blood, Angiogenesis, 3 Bücher (Editor), mehrere Buchkapitel

Blogbeiträge

• Digitales Mammographie-Screening besitzt hohe Programmsensitivität, Februar 21, 2017